What do you mean?
Not sure if they’re completely sex-repulsed, but I do know it’s at least partially so, so this is incredibly uncomfortable for them
and gross on the other person’s/People’s part.
Trying to convince them that asexuality isn’t real while showing sexual stuff to them.
I sincerely doubt it’s with the actual intention of help (even if that isn’t something to help)
It’s likely meant to be harmful.
Trying to convince them to like sexual things by throwing it in their face
Man, I’d high-tail it off of tumblr if that happened to me, I can’t handle that crap.
It’s not me that it’s happening to, it’s happening to a friend of a friend and it pisses me off.
You cannot “fix” asexuals.
Stop stop stop
what you did was still a pretty agressive move i’d say seeing as you accused me of not doing research. *shrug*
i tag things when i want discussion when i’m pretty sure none of my followers will ever grant me that. and yeah i guess you read to much on my comments or probably didnt read thoroughly because the things you called me out on like my fourth and fifth points didnt really refute my arguments more like supported them.
It came off as really aggressive towards other people’s headcanons and headcanon bashing (especially when justification isn’t amply given, just critiquing without any explanation BEHIND why the critique was made) really sets off my nerves so it was aggressive while also trying to avoid potential drama. I wanted to give you a choice on whether you replied or not.
I don’t know you and didn’t know how you would react, and my point wasn’t to refute your opinions it was to stop the bashing of possibilities.
I’m all for people having their own headcanons, and you’ve made a few more posts that site where you got the information and what explains your headcanons and they’re really neat.
I just don’t like it when possibilities are bashed or denied, so my post’s reason was to point out why people think certain ways, why certain ideas are popular, and why some of the critiques you made weren’t precisely canon, just opinion. Granted you labeled it as an opinion post so that was to be expected, but quite a lot of it came off AS aggressive bashing.
Which, I suppose wasn’t your intention.
Regardless, my point stands that I am not one to refute another person’s headcanons when they put the work in and justify it amply for themselves, in fact I was trying to point out how certain things are open to ones interpretation (such as the reading aspect, or Togami’s personality and view of tradition).
So of course it wouldn’t refute what you had to say in terms of your actual views of the character, I wasn’t intending to and still don’t intend to. I just wanted to point out that not everything is solid and there’s so much up there open to interpretation with the character, while also pointing out the common justification for certain headcanons for the character, not all of which are my views of him.
I actually agree with you that he is very utilitarian with things, in fact I’ve written a few analysis on him and his view of his title and the misconception dealing with how the fandom views him in relation to money…I just don’t think denying the possibility that he likes reading in and of itself is a definite claim, even if its justified that he likes it for its utilization..one cannot deny that such isn’t the only source of entertainment found in it.
Evolution of Harley Quinn in the Arkhamverse